Rittenhouse Finally Speaks Out — No One Expected Him To Announce This

While the media remains in meltdown mode over Rittenhouse, the youth has risen above the hatred with his head held high, as it should be.

After all, he’s effectively been crucified by the media, not to mention the supposed president, relentlessly.

Most pathetically of all, he’s been crucified for exercising one of the most basic of human rights: self-defense.

Rittenhouse reiterated that his response had absolutely nothing to do with race and everything to do with survival.

“I told everybody there, ‘I had to do it. I was just attacked.’ I was dizzy, I was vomiting, I couldn’t breathe … This case has nothing to do with race. It never had anything to do with race. It had to do with the right to self-defense.” [Source: The Blaze]

Of course it had to do with the right to self-defense, but such a narrative won’t sell very well to the looting-hungry BLM machine, not to mention the politicians, attorneys, and other figures that clearly aid and abet this behavior.

For instance, consider the commentary of Civil Rights attorney Shavar Jeffries, who apparently finds the notion of self-defense “beyond comprehension.”

“[The verdict] speaks to the dramatic differences in perspective people have, based on racial background, about justice in our country … For many people of color, the idea that they could show up with an assault rifle at the site of a rally, kill people, and find themselves exonerated is something beyond comprehension.” [Source: The Blaze]

Clearly, Jeffries decided to ignore the facts of the case in favor of the fiction of the case, the same type of fiction that spurs on the violent crime sprees that led to the Rittenhouse case in the first place.

Jeffries may find self-defense “beyond comprehension,” but if that is the case, then quite a few BLM and Antifa activities would certainly fall well outside the bounds of “comprehension.”

If “self-defense” is “beyond comprehension,” then an 80-strong gang, armed with crowbars, brazenly robbing a Nordstrom in broad daylight is certainly “beyond comprehension.”

Actually, what is “beyond comprehension” is the fact that mass-scale looting has now occurred multiple days in a row in San Francisco, ironically “represented” by none other than Nancy Pelosi.

And perhaps what is the most “beyond comprehension” of all is the fact that hardcore leftists like AOC continue to shriek about eliminating bail while criminals literally terrorize the nation.

In essence, the Biden administration effectively incentivizes criminal behavior while also shredding law-abiding citizens, such as Rittenhouse.

Though now, Rittenhouse has the power to openly call out Biden about his irresoponsible commentary, which he did.

“Mr. President, if I could say one thing to you, I would urge you to go back and watch the trial, and understand the facts before you make a statement.” [Source: The Washington Examiner]

Unfortunately, Biden couldn’t even bother to familiarize himself with Georgia’s integrity laws before brazenly siding with the MLB, so limited hope exists in that regrd.

However, Wendy Rittenhouse, Kyle’s mother, certainly hasn’t forgotten Biden’s brazen irresponsibility, particularly when he assailed her son as a “white supremacist.”

“He went to Kenosha to help people, and what Joe Biden did and showed my son’s picture, his image, and labeled him as a white supremacist, I will take him down.” [Source: The Washington Examiner]

With any luck, Biden’s gaffe just might land him in some legal hot water, at least according to Cornell Law school professor William A. Jacobson, especially if the statement was “knowingly false.”

“Whether calling someone a ‘white supremacist’ is legally actionable will depend on whether a specific state’s law considers it an opinion, in which case it would be protected speech, or a statement of fact, in which case it could be actionable if knowingly false.” [Source: Fox News]

Too bad that falsehoods appear to be the natural second language of Democrats, as well as the media generally.

Fox News Contributor Guy Benson noted the stunning lack of fact-checking with regards to Rittenhouse, which means that the media effectively turned the case into a total circus based on its own wild fictions.

“I saw example after example over the weekend of news articles from actual news organizations, supposedly with lawyers of editorial oversight, getting basic facts wrong about the case, about the trial, about the Jacob Blake police shooting from last summer that was sort of the triggering event of the rioting …

Details, of course, matter … we have larger truths being spewed all over the place that are, in fact, not truths at all. Falsehoods.” [Source: Fox News]

Where are the Facebook “fact checkers” when you need them?

Oh, that’s right … too busy colluding with Democrats behind the scenes. Or, actually out in the open, given how little shame the left has now.

Despite the disturbing trend of utter falsehoods prevailing across the media, one can only hope that Rittenhouse receives a just settlement, especially after being openly bullied by the President of the United States.

Author: Jane Jones